Skip to main content

State Management

Introduction​

In React applications, state management ensures that data flows efficiently between components. It becomes especially important as the application grows, and various components need access to shared data. Redux, Zustand, and Context API are tools that address this challenge by providing efficient and organized ways to manage state.

Type of State Manament​

Redux: The Predictable State Container​

Pros​

  • Centralized state management: Redux stores the application state in a single store, making it easy to maintain and access data.
  • Predictable state changes: Redux follows a strict unidirectional data flow, which simplifies debugging and testing.
  • Large community support: Redux has a massive community and a wealth of libraries and tools built around it.

Cons​

  • Boilerplate code: Redux can involve writing a significant amount of boilerplate code, which may increase development time.
  • Steeper learning curve: Beginners may find Redux’s concepts, such as reducers and actions, challenging to grasp initially.

Example Usage​

// Redux store setup
import { createStore } from 'redux';
import rootReducer from './reducers';

const store = createStore(rootReducer);

// Redux action
const ADD_TODO = 'ADD_TODO';
const addTodo = (text) => ({
  type: ADD_TODO,
  payload: { text },
});

// Redux reducer
const initialState = {
  todos: [],
};

const rootReducer = (state = initialState, action) => {
  switch (action.type) {
    case ADD_TODO:
      return {
        ...state,
        todos: [...state.todos, action.payload.text],
      };
    default:
      return state;
  }
};

Zustand: A Simple State Management Solution​

https://github.com/pmndrs/zustand/tree/main

Pros​

  • Minimal setup: Zustand requires less boilerplate code compared to Redux, making it quick and easy to set up.
  • Lightweight: Zustand is a small library with a focus on performance, making it suitable for smaller projects.
  • Easy integration: Zustand can be used alongside other state management solutions like Redux or MobX.

Cons​

  • Limited ecosystem: Zustand’s ecosystem is smaller compared to Redux, which means fewer third-party tools and libraries.
  • Not suitable for complex applications: Zustand’s simplicity may limit its suitability for large and complex applications.

Example Usage​

import create from 'zustand';

const useStore = create((set) => ({
  count: 0,
  increment: () => set((state) => ({ count: state.count + 1 })),
}));

function Counter() {
  const { count, increment } = useStore();

  return <button onClick={increment}>{count}</button>;
}

Context API: Built-in State Management in React​

Pros​

  • Built-in React feature: Context API comes with React, eliminating the need for additional libraries or dependencies.
  • Simplicity: Context API provides a straightforward way to share state across components without complex setups.
  • Easy to use with small applications: For small-scale applications, Context API can be sufficient as a state management solution.

Cons​

  • Performance concerns: Context API may lead to unnecessary re-renders, impacting performance in larger applications.
  • Global state management: Using Context API for global state management can lead to potential challenges in tracking state changes.

Example Usage​

// Context API setup
import { createContext, useContext, useState } from 'react';

const TodoContext = createContext();

const TodoProvider = ({ children }) => {
  const [todos, setTodos] = useState([]);

  const addTodo = (text) => {
    setTodos([...todos, text]);
  };

  return (
    <TodoContext.Provider value={{ todos, addTodo }}>
      {children}
    </TodoContext.Provider>
  );
};

const useTodoContext = () => useContext(TodoContext);

When to use Redux, Zustand, or Context API?​

Redux:​

  • Use Redux for large-scale applications with complex state management needs.
  • Choose Redux if you require strict data flow and a well-defined architecture.
  • Redux is an excellent choice for projects with a large development team and the need for standardized state management practices.

Zustand:​

  • Zustand is best suited for smaller applications or specific components with localized state needs.
  • Consider Zustand when you prefer a lightweight state management solution with minimal setup.
  • Zustand is ideal for projects where simplicity and performance are essential.

Context API:​

  • Use Context API for small applications or when managing state within individual components.
  • Context API is a good choice when you want a built-in, easy-to-use state management solution with less complexity.
  • Context API is well-suited for scenarios where global state management is not a primary concern.

Performance Consideration​

In terms of performance, Zustand generally outperforms Redux and Context API due to its simplicity and lightweight nature. However, Redux can optimize performance using tools like Reselect or Redux Toolkit. Context API may lead to performance issues in larger applications due to potential re-renders, but this can be mitigated by using memoization techniques.

Reference​

Type of state management. https://github.com/olegrjumin/awesome-react-state-management [Accessed 14 May 2024]

Original blog. https://bootcamp.uxdesign.cc/redux-vs-zustand-vs-context-api-their-pros-cons-and-usage-d3bcbb79ab6a [Accessed 14 May 2024]